Snapmaker U1 vs QIDI Tech X-Max 3
The Snapmaker U1 (2026, €899) and the QIDI Tech X-Max 3 (2023, €999) are two FDM 3D printers many people compare before buying.
The Snapmaker U1 is the more affordable of the two, with a gap of about 100 (~10%) versus the other.
On the technical side, only the Snapmaker U1 supports multicolor (AMS), and the QIDI Tech X-Max 3 offers more build volume (325×325×315 mm).
Below is the full spec table with the best value of each feature highlighted, plus a verdict by use case.
← Swipe to see more →
| Snapmaker U1 €899 | QIDI Tech X-Max 3 €999 | |
|---|---|---|
| Geometry | ||
| Build volume | 270³ mm | 325×325×315 mm 🏆 |
| Weight | 18.2 kg | 30.2 kg |
| Speed | ||
| Max speed | 500 mm/s | 600 mm/s 🏆 |
| Max acceleration | 20,000 mm/s² | 20,000 mm/s² |
| Hot-end | ||
| Max nozzle temp | 300 °C | 350 °C 🏆 |
| Nozzle material | stainless steel | hardened steel |
| Drive type | direct | direct |
| Flow rate | — | 35 mm³/s 🏆 |
| Bed | ||
| Max bed temp | 100 °C | 120 °C 🏆 |
| Bed material | PEI steel sheet | PEI plate |
| Auto-leveling | mesh | auto mesh |
| Enclosed | Yes | Yes |
| Heated chamber | No | Yes 🏆 |
| Multimaterial | ||
| AMS compatible | Yes 🏆 | No |
| AMS type | toolchanger | — |
| AMS slots | 4 🏆 | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet | — | Yes |
| Camera | Yes () | Yes (720p) |
| Calibration | ||
| Vibration compensation | — | Yes |
| Flow calibration | — | Yes |
| Input shaping | — | Yes |
| Pressure advance | — | Yes |
| Software | ||
| Official slicer | Snapmaker Orca | Qidi Slicer (OrcaSlicer fork) |
| OrcaSlicer | — | Yes |
| Noise | ||
| Noise | — | — |
| Power | 1150 W | 1000 W 🏆 |
Verdict
- If speed matters most, the QIDI Tech X-Max 3 wins.
- On price, Snapmaker U1 is cheaper.
Frequently asked
- Which has better value: Snapmaker U1 or QIDI Tech X-Max 3?
- See the full spec table for the best decision based on your use case.
- Which has the larger build volume?
- QIDI Tech X-Max 3 with 325×325×315 mm.